MedicalToxic CMS · Editorial platform
The newsroom behind every article on this site: a purpose-built platform where clinician-authors write, editors review, and nothing reaches readers until an expert approves it.
MedicalToxic CMS in two minutes
Video coming soon
Editorial workflow
Every piece of content moves through a review pipeline with versions snapshotted at each milestone — five versions per item, restorable in one click, and an 18-category audit log of who did what.
The author writes; autosave and offline backup guard every word.
Submitted for review — it appears in the editors’ approval queue.
Sent back with notes; the author edits and resubmits.
An expert approved it — now it is live on MedicalToxic.
Inside the newsroom
A distraction-free editor with slash commands, tables, and a drag-and-drop citation manager — numbered references that clean up after themselves.
Autosave two seconds after you pause, offline backup when the connection drops, and retry with backoff until the save lands.
Snapshots at every editorial milestone — submitted, accepted, revisable, restored — with one-click restore for reviewers.
Live slug uniqueness checks, per-item meta descriptions, up to 60 keywords, and required alt text on every image.
Authors, admins, SEO managers, and superusers each see their own workspace — with an 18-category activity log per member.
A daily AI-assembled toxicology news digest from PubMed and news sources, plus a weekly newsletter — generated, then reviewed like everything else.
Every blog, guideline, case study, and news item on MedicalToxic came through this pipeline.
Transparency
By creating an account, or simply by using MedicalToxic CMS, you accept its Terms & Conditions — and your information is handled exactly the way its Privacy Policy describes. We keep both documents short enough to actually read, so take a few minutes before you sign up: they spell out what we collect, what we never touch, and the rules that keep the platform safe for everyone.